این بخش دومین بخش در آزمون سه مهارتی آیلتس می باشد. 60 دقیقه زمان به آن اختصاص داده شده است. متن ها همگی واقعی هستند و از کتاب ها و مجلات مختلف گرفته میشوند. برای هر دو آزمون آکادمیک و جنرال مهارت ریدینگ (Reading module) که متشکل از سه قسمت بوده و تقریبا بین 2150 تا 2750 کلمه در آن استفاده میشود. بخش ریدینگ آزمون آیلتس شامل 40 سوال است. سوالات چندگزینه ای ، وصل کردنی ، علامت گذاری نقشه و جدول، پرکردن فرم ، یادداشت یا جدول، پرکردن جمله، سوال های کوتاه جواب، Yes/No/NG ، T/F/NG، وصل کردن heading ها.(درمورد انواع سوالات مفصل توضیح خواهیم داد.)
تفاوت ریدینگ آیلتس آکادمیک و جنرال
- ریدینگ ایلتس اکادمیک : Academic Reading
آزمون آیلتس آکادمیک دارای سه ریدینگ می باشد. هر بخش دارای یک متن طولانی ست که واقعی بوده و از کتاب ها یا مجلات مختلف گرفته میشوند. هیچ جای نگرانی برای تخصصی بودن متن آنها وجود ندارد. این متون برای افراد متخصص نوشته نشده اند و در صورت داشتن سطح خوبی از زبان به راحتی قابل فهم هستند. درواقع مناسب کسانی است که قصد ادامه تحصیل دارند. ممکن است متون شامل جدول ، نمودار، چارت نیز باشند.
- ریدینگ ایلتس جنرال : General Training Reading
در آزمون آیلتس جنرال قسمت ریدینگ، بخش اول دو تا سه متن کوتاه دارد که حتی یکی از آن ها ممکن است چندبخشی باشد (6 تا 8 متن کوتاه داشته باشد مانند تبلیغات هتل های مختلف) ، موضوعات با توجه به زندگی روزمره در یک کشور انگلیسی زبان انتخاب می شوند.
بخش دوم دو متن کوتاه دارد که موضوع آن شغلی است مثل تقاضای شغل کردن، قوانین شرکت ها، حقوق ، امکانات محیط کار و غیره
بخش سوم دارای متنی طولانی تر و پیچیده تر درمورد موضوعات کلی است.
در بخش Reading این مهارت ها در شما نشانه گرفته میشود:
- مهارت خواندن برای درک کلی موضوع
- مهارت خواندن برای درک موضوعات اصلی
- مهارت خواندن برای درک موضوعات جزئی
- درکمفاهیم و مفهوم ضمنی
- شناخت نظرات و نگرش و هدف نویسنده
- دنبال کردن یک بحث
محاسبه نمره ریدینگ ایلتس
هر جواب درست 1 نمره دارد و نمره ها از 40 در آخر به سیستم نمره دهی آیلتس از 0 تا 9 که قبلا درمورد آن توضیح دادیم برگردانده می شود. با استفاده از جدول زیر می توانید نمرات خود را هنگام تمرین تبدیل به نمره ی 0 تا 9 کنید.
نمونه ریدینگ آیلتس به همراه جواب
READING PASSAGE 2 You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 14-26, which are based on Reading Passage 2. |
Less Televition, Less Violence and Aggrenion |
Cutting back on television, videos, and video games reduces acts of aggression among schoolchildren, according to a study by Dr. Thomas Robinson and others from the Stanford University School of Medicine. The study, published in the January 2001 issue of the Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, found that third- and fourth-grade students who took part in a curriculum to reduce their TV, video, and video game use engaged in fewer acts of verbal and physical aggression than their peers. The study took place in two similar San Jose, California, elementary schools. Students in one-20 school underwent an 18-lesson, 6-month program designed to limit their media usage, while the others did not. Both groups of students had similar reports of aggressive behavior at the beginning of the study. After the six-month program, however, the two groups had very real differences. The students who cut bach on their TV time engaged in six fewer acts of verbal aggression per hour and rated 2.4 percent fewer of their classmates as aggressive after the program. Physical acts of violence, parental reports of aggressive behavior, and perceptions of a mean and scary world also decreased, but the authors suggest further study to solidify these results. Although many studies have shown that children who watch a lot of TV are more likely to act violently, this report further verifies that television, videos, and video games actually cause the violent behavior, and it is among the first to evaluate a solution to the problem. Teachers at the intervention school included the program in their existing curriculum. Early lessons encouraged students to keep track of and report on the time they spent watching TV or videos, or playing Video games, to motivate them to limit those activities on their own. The initial lessons were followed by TV-Turnoff, an organization that encourages less TV viewing. For ten days, students were challenged to go without television, videos, or video games. After that, teachers encouraged the students to stay within a media allowance of seven hours per week. Almost all students participated in the Turnoff, and most stayed under their budget for the following weeks. Additional lessons encodtaged children to use their time more selectively, and many of the final lessons had students themselves advociate reducing screen activities. This study is by no means the first to find a link between television and violence. Virtually all of 3,500 research studies on the subject in the past 40 years have shown the same relationship, according to the American Academy of Pediatrics. Among the most noteworthy studies is Dr. Leonard D. Eron’s, which found that exposure to television violence in childhood is the strongest predictor of aggressive behavior later in life—stronger even than violent behavior as children. The more violent television the subjects watched at age eight, the more serious was their aggressive behavior even 22 years later. Another study by Dr. Brandon S. Centerwall found that murder rates climb after the introduction of television. In the United States and Canada, murder rates doubled 10 to 15 years after the introduction of television, after the first TV generation grew up. Centerwall tested this pattern in South Africa, where television broadcasts were banned until 1975. Murder rates in South Africa remained relatively steady from the mid-1940s through the mid- 1970s. By 1987, however, the murder rate had increased 130 percent from its 1974 level. The murder rates in the United States and Canada had leveled1 off in the meantime. CenterwalPs study implies that the medium of television, not just the content, promotes violence and the current study by Dr. Robinson supports that conclusion. The Turnoff did not specifically target violent television, nor did the following allowance period. Reducing television in general reduces aggressive behavior. Even television that is not “violent” is more violent than real life and may lead viewers to believe that violence is funny, inconsequential, and a viable solution to problems. Also, watching television of any content robs us of the time to interact with real people. Watching too much TV may inhibit the skills and patience we need to get along with others without resorting to aggression. TV, as a medium, promotes aggression and violence. The best solution is to turn it off. |